Bike commute, day 2
Jul. 29th, 2014 10:21 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Villa Maria house was 3 miles from campus, which was just below my threshold for gearing up for a REAL bike commute, so in the summertime that has basically meant I have been showing up in work clothes, soaked in sweat, and marinate in that sweat throughout the day. The new homestead is about 5 miles out, which I deem long enough for a change in commuting strategy: put on spandex, cool down upon arrival for a few minutes, pack a change of clothes and a washcloth.
WAY more civilized.
The smooth pavement and straight-shot road are also WAY more civilized.
And now I've reached a level of Hobo Style where, if I had to pack for a trip, all I would need to do is add a couple more pairs of underwear and socks to my pannier, and I could then just grab the pannier and my backpack, and I'd be ready to go.
Froinlavin broke a fifth spoke last night on the ride home, so I had to fix the Jolly Roger's flat and reinstall the worn-out front tire. At least the debris levels are minimal on the new commute. Sections of the old commute are grimy.
The Jolly Roger is oddly quiet without the picnic basket. Also oddly aerodynamic and efficient. The CETMA rack by itself is hardly noticeable.
WAY more civilized.
The smooth pavement and straight-shot road are also WAY more civilized.
And now I've reached a level of Hobo Style where, if I had to pack for a trip, all I would need to do is add a couple more pairs of underwear and socks to my pannier, and I could then just grab the pannier and my backpack, and I'd be ready to go.
Froinlavin broke a fifth spoke last night on the ride home, so I had to fix the Jolly Roger's flat and reinstall the worn-out front tire. At least the debris levels are minimal on the new commute. Sections of the old commute are grimy.
The Jolly Roger is oddly quiet without the picnic basket. Also oddly aerodynamic and efficient. The CETMA rack by itself is hardly noticeable.
Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-29 06:10 pm (UTC)Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-29 06:55 pm (UTC)It's hard to say for the "average" rider. Who is average, and where is he or she living? Someone living in a place like Copenhagen, Boston, or Seattle would probably want a commute at under 20-30 minutes. My dad had a 15-mile bike commute for several decades, with some breaks in the wintertime when he would van pool instead. In the Phoenix area, I talked to more than one bicycle commuter who traveled 20-25 miles one-way. So the one-hour mark could be a useful benchmark, too. But then there are crazy stories of people with driving or bus commutes that take more time than that. That would crush my soul.
Also realize that there tend to be two very different classes of bike commuter. I fall into the middle-class white person category - I could theoretically afford to commute using other modes of transportation, but I choose to bike instead, and I have a decent bike. I would guess that lower-income bike commuters would look for commutes in the 20-30 minute time range, ridden on poor-quality equipment, but that such individuals probably also scrap around a fair amount to figure out other options, especially carpooling. I found this piece on low-income commuters to be pretty informative.
If I lived less than a mile from my job, I would probably alternate between biking in and walking. I'm very careful to site my home location relative to the things I want to do (rowing, work, errands).
Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 03:11 pm (UTC)Ah, another thing I spend too much time thinking about: the death of practical exercise. Once upon a time -- actually, less than a century ago -- most people got plenty of "exercise" from their job. The need to get more physical activity simply didn't exist.
Now, however, most people get very little physical activity on the job, so they need to exercise. Except that they then arrange their lives to avoid as much motion as possible.
For example, we live in a townhouse neighborhood, and each of the townhouses has a tiny lawn. The smallest of them could be mowed with a push mower; they're easier to measure in square feet than in acres. A couple of people do just that. But a whole lotta folks here hire people to mow their tiny lawns. So a guy shows up with a huge industrial mower, makes a couple of tight turns on the tiny lawn, and leaves. It simply baffles me. It would be a lot cheaper do it themselves, and would get them up and moving a little.
Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 03:22 pm (UTC)I'm a firm believer in walkability, too, although I am NOT a firm believer in automatic "walk score" calculators.
This town lacks sidewalks. I can't bring myself to call it a city when it's impossible to walk to get places. It was easier to walk in Tempe, and even then, it wasn't especially pleasant to walk. Boston, Seattle, and Washington, D.C. rank high on my list in that regard. Even bicycling becomes inconvenient at points in such cities.
It seems to me that a lot of Texas has been engineered to discourage practical exercise. Lawns are so large that riding lawnmowers are preferred. Things are spread out in such a way that it is challenging to use alternate transportation. The bus system leaves a LOT to be desired. Even Austin, a longtime poster child of bike-friendliness, isn't really a compact city anymore, and most of the people who say they live in Austin actually live in suburbs and clog highways with increasingly longer car commutes.
It is so, so much easier to get exercise when it's built into a daily routine than when it has to be scheduled in. I really feel like children NEED to walk or bike to school.
Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 02:14 am (UTC)Studies indicate that gas price is the best predictor of commuting, regardless of distance.
Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 03:48 am (UTC)Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 03:59 am (UTC)Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 02:44 pm (UTC)Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-31 03:49 am (UTC)If I lived 5-15 miles from work I'd ride in a whole lot more often, especially if I lived in the Boulder area and had a pretty ride in, with coworkers who commute in every day. But a solo ride on busy roads is demotivational.
Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-31 02:21 pm (UTC)Although, on the flipside, I'm REALLY careful about where I choose to live, specifically because I want to be able to rock the commute, and want to continue avoiding buying a car. I've car-shopped pretty intensively more than once, but I really don't want the bother and expense of it all. Running errands with J in the car last weekend was a strong reminder of that. Give me a bike and a bike trailer, and I can haul all kinds of stuff and actually enjoy running errands!
Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 03:18 pm (UTC)Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 03:26 pm (UTC)But overall, as distances increases, the probability of not biking goes up.
Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 04:50 pm (UTC)I'd guesstimated a little faster than than that (15-20mph) from thinking in terms of the mechanical advantage bikes provide over walking. But you're right that I should have taken into account traffic delays. (Which, since I'm a naughty child, I tend to ignore while walking.)
Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 04:54 pm (UTC)Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-30 06:25 pm (UTC)Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-31 03:36 am (UTC)Re: Opinion question
Date: 2014-07-31 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-30 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-30 02:46 pm (UTC)I am glad, however, that I don't have to come in to the lab 3 times a day on weekends at the moment. Although I suppose if I wound up on that sort of schedule, I'd just come in for the whole day.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-31 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-31 02:16 pm (UTC)