Revisionist Histories
Aug. 2nd, 2012 09:44 amOne of the blogs I read periodically, but sometimes get irritated with, is Rowdy Kittens, written by someone who lives in a tiny house in Portland. I can't fully articulate what irritates me, but I can tell you that T often touches on good subjects.
Recently, she blogged about keeping her old journals. Quite a while back,
scrottie blogged about how many of his friends have deleted their old livejournals. That action leads to a lot of speculation, without much direct information about what's going through a person's head - after all, they aren't blogging anymore. Something similar happened with my friend DM, although in that case I had an opportunity to have a conversation with her and ask about her decision.
I guess I feel like I'm at the other end of the spectrum. I started writing in a journal in third grade, and I still have that journal, even though it starts out with an unhappy entry, written in large, third-grade handwriting: "Today is my birthday. Not so good of a day." The second entry isn't much better: "I have felt lonely ever since the second grade."
annikusrex and I used to sit down together to re-read through our journals periodically, sharing excerpts with each other. Eventually, along came the internet, and suddenly the barriers to self-publishing were lowered.
Ever since starting to blog on Livejournal, I've gone back and forth between the electronic journal and the paper one. The paper one has been neglected, although the few and far-in-between entries are still important. I've only written in there three times in 2012.
Somewhere in the middle of grad school, I made a decision about my journals. I wrote out a letter and made copies of it, and put the copies in all of the journals I've kept since that third grade one. Perhaps they're morbid, but they reflect my sense of self - I just ask that, whoever should find my journals after I'm dead, that hopefully if that person is someone I know and trust well, that I wish for the person to read through all of the journals, from that third-grader through the ridiculously angsty teenager up to the final pages. Then that person can decide whether to keep everything together, or lay it all to rest. I made this decision because I think it's important for us to know each other as complete people, capable of change, and incredibly imperfect.
I revisit the paper journal entries more frequently than the Livejournal entries. It's hard to page through old entries in a blog, and besides, I type so much that the sheer volume of information is overwhelming.
I had to look back, this morning, for things I wrote about when trying to decide about a roommate, and finally found what I'd written back in November. For me, it's useful to see that the things I was thinking and blogging about have been consistent between then and now (although, of course, a person should feel free to change her mind). Even though it's still very hard to make declarations but be in limbo all at the same time.
Talking to T, in Nebraska - he told me a number of different stories of students he's had over the years. He expressed a lot of surprise when he tried to be really clear with certain students about what things they needed to think about doing, but then those students failed to follow his advice and wound up dropping out of science (this ties in to ideas of how to respond constructively to criticism). In one particular case, a student dropped out without a clear route for publishing her work and findings, and now T is stuck with some useful, insightful data that he can't really use because he has no contact with the data's creator.
In comparison, for my career situation, T has been absolutely and completely supportive, and basically a useful mentor inasmuch as he can mentor from afar. I think much of his motivation has to do with wanting to encourage women in science, and also with reaching a point where he's ready to pass the torch to the next generation of scientists.
It's hard to know exactly what's the right thing to do, given some of the complexities of my situation - especially in terms of coping with feelings of uncertainty about the future, and not having a well-developed support network here in Texas. Regardless, I have to struggle on, and not shy away from the imperfections in that struggle.
Recently, she blogged about keeping her old journals. Quite a while back,
I guess I feel like I'm at the other end of the spectrum. I started writing in a journal in third grade, and I still have that journal, even though it starts out with an unhappy entry, written in large, third-grade handwriting: "Today is my birthday. Not so good of a day." The second entry isn't much better: "I have felt lonely ever since the second grade."
Ever since starting to blog on Livejournal, I've gone back and forth between the electronic journal and the paper one. The paper one has been neglected, although the few and far-in-between entries are still important. I've only written in there three times in 2012.
Somewhere in the middle of grad school, I made a decision about my journals. I wrote out a letter and made copies of it, and put the copies in all of the journals I've kept since that third grade one. Perhaps they're morbid, but they reflect my sense of self - I just ask that, whoever should find my journals after I'm dead, that hopefully if that person is someone I know and trust well, that I wish for the person to read through all of the journals, from that third-grader through the ridiculously angsty teenager up to the final pages. Then that person can decide whether to keep everything together, or lay it all to rest. I made this decision because I think it's important for us to know each other as complete people, capable of change, and incredibly imperfect.
I revisit the paper journal entries more frequently than the Livejournal entries. It's hard to page through old entries in a blog, and besides, I type so much that the sheer volume of information is overwhelming.
I had to look back, this morning, for things I wrote about when trying to decide about a roommate, and finally found what I'd written back in November. For me, it's useful to see that the things I was thinking and blogging about have been consistent between then and now (although, of course, a person should feel free to change her mind). Even though it's still very hard to make declarations but be in limbo all at the same time.
Talking to T, in Nebraska - he told me a number of different stories of students he's had over the years. He expressed a lot of surprise when he tried to be really clear with certain students about what things they needed to think about doing, but then those students failed to follow his advice and wound up dropping out of science (this ties in to ideas of how to respond constructively to criticism). In one particular case, a student dropped out without a clear route for publishing her work and findings, and now T is stuck with some useful, insightful data that he can't really use because he has no contact with the data's creator.
In comparison, for my career situation, T has been absolutely and completely supportive, and basically a useful mentor inasmuch as he can mentor from afar. I think much of his motivation has to do with wanting to encourage women in science, and also with reaching a point where he's ready to pass the torch to the next generation of scientists.
It's hard to know exactly what's the right thing to do, given some of the complexities of my situation - especially in terms of coping with feelings of uncertainty about the future, and not having a well-developed support network here in Texas. Regardless, I have to struggle on, and not shy away from the imperfections in that struggle.