Thinking of the bees; Thinking
Mar. 21st, 2013 11:30 amOne of my dissertation committee members is in town for a visit, so our lab had dinner with him last night. Ahh, it was such a nice evening!
Over the course of dinner, we discussed no small number of things, but here's an anecdote that stuck with me. There's a honey bee researcher at ASU who divides her time between ASU and a university in Norway. One of her colleagues in Norway has been studying the microbes found in the honey bee gut; there are seven major classes of microbes. To understand what the microbes are doing, he goes through and selectively removes one of the classes by applying antibiotics specific to each of them.
He wants to do this in the US as well, but discovered that all of the microbe strains in US honey bees are resistant to the antibiotics he's been using in Norway.
This is an epiphenomenon. Where are the honey bees acquiring the microbes, and how on earth are the microbes gaining antibiotic resistance? It's unlikely that this results from the smorgasbord of miticides and other agents applied directly to hives to control other, known honey bee pests.
--
One of the main reasons I was convinced to adopt a writing schedule was a figure on page 25 of How to Write a Lot. It has two panels, one of which documents the number of pages written per day by three groups of scientists. The first group was instructed to not write - a control group (so they wrote less than half a page per day). The second group was instructed to write only when they felt inspired; they wrote an average of one page per day. The third group was forced to write during scheduled writing periods; they wrote an average of 3 pages per day. [They were held to this schedule by threat of having to write a check to a disliked organization if they failed to keep this commitment.]
All well and good. It's the second panel that's more interesting - the number of days between creative ideas. The non-writing group had an average of 5 days between creative ideas; the "spontaneous" writers, two days, while the scheduled writers averaged one day.
For me, establishing a writing schedule is giving me things to think about while I'm out riding my bicycle, and when I wake up in the morning. Right now, I have a lot of head-scratching to do while I work on revising Diss Chap 1 for resubmission.
Overall, I have a longstanding, deep, dark fear of becoming stupid. You might think I'm crazy to admit this, but there you have it. This scheduled writing time is an attempt to counteract a tendency towards intellectual laziness and stupidity for me. Maybe other methods work for other people, but I'm not so arrogant to think that's the case for myself.
Over the course of dinner, we discussed no small number of things, but here's an anecdote that stuck with me. There's a honey bee researcher at ASU who divides her time between ASU and a university in Norway. One of her colleagues in Norway has been studying the microbes found in the honey bee gut; there are seven major classes of microbes. To understand what the microbes are doing, he goes through and selectively removes one of the classes by applying antibiotics specific to each of them.
He wants to do this in the US as well, but discovered that all of the microbe strains in US honey bees are resistant to the antibiotics he's been using in Norway.
This is an epiphenomenon. Where are the honey bees acquiring the microbes, and how on earth are the microbes gaining antibiotic resistance? It's unlikely that this results from the smorgasbord of miticides and other agents applied directly to hives to control other, known honey bee pests.
--
One of the main reasons I was convinced to adopt a writing schedule was a figure on page 25 of How to Write a Lot. It has two panels, one of which documents the number of pages written per day by three groups of scientists. The first group was instructed to not write - a control group (so they wrote less than half a page per day). The second group was instructed to write only when they felt inspired; they wrote an average of one page per day. The third group was forced to write during scheduled writing periods; they wrote an average of 3 pages per day. [They were held to this schedule by threat of having to write a check to a disliked organization if they failed to keep this commitment.]
All well and good. It's the second panel that's more interesting - the number of days between creative ideas. The non-writing group had an average of 5 days between creative ideas; the "spontaneous" writers, two days, while the scheduled writers averaged one day.
For me, establishing a writing schedule is giving me things to think about while I'm out riding my bicycle, and when I wake up in the morning. Right now, I have a lot of head-scratching to do while I work on revising Diss Chap 1 for resubmission.
Overall, I have a longstanding, deep, dark fear of becoming stupid. You might think I'm crazy to admit this, but there you have it. This scheduled writing time is an attempt to counteract a tendency towards intellectual laziness and stupidity for me. Maybe other methods work for other people, but I'm not so arrogant to think that's the case for myself.