A unit of mechanical work
Sep. 29th, 2007 12:02 pmThis morning, I got up at 5:30, ate breakfast, and then went with K to a garage in north-downtown Phoenix. We met up with a small group of other people, arranged things just so, and then climbed on to our waiting beasts: eight ergometers, those indoor rowing machines that most rowers view with a particular horror. We set our computers for 42,195 m, or 26.2 miles, the same distance as a running marathon. We started up a movie on the TV, dimmed the lights, and began to row.
Three hours and various minutes later, we finished. As one of the marathoners noted, probably most of the rest of humanity would figure us insane to devote so much time and energy for the sole purpose of seeing how fast we can go over that incredible distance, on a stationary machine, no less. Most of the rest of humanity is probably right.
And yet--I had to give myself the option to opt-out by completing only a half marathon, given the questionable state of my health. But did I stop at 21,097 m? Of course not. After I made it that far, how could I not carry on and complete the full distance? So I did. Besides, given the various endurance activities I've pursued, I have to say that long-distance running was the stupidest. It's nice to have that perspective. I'm just not built to run, so it's foolish and hard on my body to expend so much effort trying.
What's even more incredible is that I managed to go faster than I did last year. Granted, it was by a mere two minutes (3 hours, 21 minutes, 40.9 seconds), but as last year's on-the-water marathon showed, those slight differences may be all the edge one needs. I'd credit my improvement to all of the bicycling that I have been doing.
For some perspective in a slightly more comprehensible unit, that's 2381 calories expended, or 173 watts.
Anyway, now I am tired, to put it mildly, so my bed and I are going to spend some quality time together.
Three hours and various minutes later, we finished. As one of the marathoners noted, probably most of the rest of humanity would figure us insane to devote so much time and energy for the sole purpose of seeing how fast we can go over that incredible distance, on a stationary machine, no less. Most of the rest of humanity is probably right.
And yet--I had to give myself the option to opt-out by completing only a half marathon, given the questionable state of my health. But did I stop at 21,097 m? Of course not. After I made it that far, how could I not carry on and complete the full distance? So I did. Besides, given the various endurance activities I've pursued, I have to say that long-distance running was the stupidest. It's nice to have that perspective. I'm just not built to run, so it's foolish and hard on my body to expend so much effort trying.
What's even more incredible is that I managed to go faster than I did last year. Granted, it was by a mere two minutes (3 hours, 21 minutes, 40.9 seconds), but as last year's on-the-water marathon showed, those slight differences may be all the edge one needs. I'd credit my improvement to all of the bicycling that I have been doing.
For some perspective in a slightly more comprehensible unit, that's 2381 calories expended, or 173 watts.
Anyway, now I am tired, to put it mildly, so my bed and I are going to spend some quality time together.